Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 8021 - 8040 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(D068185; 4  Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:23 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    The Court also determined that Plaintiffs failed to establish superiority of a class action. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by Giovanni Comandé
Unlike many legal commentators that have criticized the European Courts, we conclude that the approach of the Courts is justified both from a purely legal standpoint and from a Law and Economics perspective. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In the recent decision Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice heard a matter that arose out of an employer’s alleged violation of employee privacy. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 12:51 am
The link to my article is here.The Supreme Court has said as early as 1964, in Kharak Singh and others v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In the recent decision Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice heard a matter that arose out of an employer’s alleged violation of employee privacy. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Scott Hervey
  Ren Ventures argued that it has superior trademark rights due to its use and registration of SABACC. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
" In 2001 the Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:17 am
This does not make the Supreme Court supreme over the other branches — recall Madison’s statement in The Federalist No. 49 concerning the Constitution’s separation of powers:  “The several departments being perfectly co-ordinate by the terms of their common commission, neither of them, it is evident, can pretend to an exclusive or superior right of settling the boundaries between their respective powers. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Goold argues that such a rule is superior to strict liability because it creates incentives for both the IP holder and the user to avoid infringement [p. 72]. [read post]