Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 8041 - 8060 of 8,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2008, 5:01 am
  Many major cities in the United States are adding courtroom A/V expenses into their budgets. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:01 am
  Many major cities in the United States are adding courtroom A/V expenses into their budgets. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
AS AN ASIDE, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE HIGHEST DAMAGE AWARD CASES IN TRADEMARKS TEND TO BE REVERSE CONFUSION CASES, BUT IN THOSE CASES, IT TENDS TO BE DAVID v GOLIATH. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:40 pm
References Baird & Weisberg, Rules, Standards, and the Battle of the Forms: A Reassessment of § 2-207, 68 Virginia Law Review 1217 (1982). [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We didn’t intend to go to battle. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:00 pm
It must be an account of why changes in constitutional doctrine over time- which largely occur outside of Article V amendment and are not in the control of any single person, much less any single judge- are legitimate. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 4:55 am by Sophia Tang
Three years later, the Amsterdam District Court made a decision on 12 December 12, 2018, [3] ending one chapter in the legal battle over the statue of Zhanggong-zushi, but failed to resolve a controversial situation or illuminate the path forward for the parties, as the Dutch court did not decide anything about the ownership of the parties.[4] It simply determined not to hear the case, based on its finding that the two village committees did not have standing to sue in the Dutch court.[5]… [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
"Specialized courts are much different from traditional adversarial courts where two sides battle it out for the best result," says Assistant Director of Probation Steve Fabbri. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
An op-ed in the Wall Street Journal after the decision argued (lamely) that Citizens United is a key victory for business in the battle to reduce the influence of trial lawyers. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
An op-ed in the Wall Street Journal after the decision argued (lamely) that Citizens United is a key victory for business in the battle to reduce the influence of trial lawyers. [read post]