Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 26,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual combat. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:50 pm
Such individuals would be able to enter the United States using the visa and avoid having to wait for a visa to become available from their home country. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 1:06 pm
They have repeatedly stated their commitment to these views. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost remarks that given the justices’ ostensible concern “about the risk of diplomatic friction between the United States and other countries when they decided to bar suits in U.S. courts against foreign corporations for violations of international law” last week in Jesner v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:04 am
v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
" Likewise, Rosenblatt v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Mahinda Rajapaksa of Sri LankaThe case of the day is Devi v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm
Article V 1. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:17 am
In Sim v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm
Kavanaugh's confirmation, as well as the chipping away of Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:49 am
The result the Supreme Court reached in Clinton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
Rohini Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm
Kavanaugh's confirmation, as well as the chipping away of Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
" Before Bilski, the last case considered by the Supreme Court that involved what constitutes patentable subject matter under Section 101 of the country’s patent laws—was the Diamond v. [read post]
