Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 42,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am
In State v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
.'"] Two weeks ago, I blogged about Gary et al v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:51 am
On December 19, she received a notice stating that the board would address her employment status during a closed meeting on December 21. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
Merricks v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am
Mazars/Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:13 am
The case is Friends of Danny DeVito et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:57 am
The complaint (full text) in Tabernacle Baptist Church, Inc. of Nicholasville, Kentucky v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse remarks that two cases to be argued next week that ask whether states can require presidential electors to vote for the choice of the state’s voters “present the court with a fascinating and ideologically fraught problem of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet to win a Webby for the best News & Politics podcast series THE Q&A: “Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary,” Senate Judiciary Committee Oral Arguments in Judiciary Committee v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:55 pm
State of Nevada (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:47 pm
Nor can the State legally cancel the primary election scheduled for June 23, 2020.The case is Yang v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:04 pm
State of Nevada (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
But in recent weeks, as outside calls for remote voting or a similar solution have grown louder, an expanding number of legislators from both parties have voiced increased public support for some form of remote voting. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
