Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
ESSENCE.COM: For argument’s sake, let’s say Obama is only a naturalized citizen, and was raised by Americans and grew up in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
United States, Case No. 05-2135, the Sixth Circuit reviewed petitioner Richards' claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a direct criminal appeal on Richards' behalf and, alternatively, for failing to consult Richards about filing an appeal. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
[www.waynetompkins.us]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDAWAYNE TOMPKINS,Petitioner,v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION WAYNE TOMPKINS, Petitioner, Case No. 8:08-cv-2212-T-23MAP v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
United States,540 U.S. 375, 381, 124 S. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Merits briefs for petitioners are due Thursday in Hawaii, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:11 am
(I.e., at the embassy abroad or at a Service Center in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 9:26 pm
The immigration courts, relying on the circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 9:24 am
Goldsmith; United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:08 am
The petitioners provided three listing options for consideration by the Service: (1) Listing the U.S. population as a Distinct Population Segment (DPS); (2) listing Thamnophis eques megalops throughout its range in the United States and Mexico based on its rangewide status; or (3) listing Thamnophis eques megalops throughout its range in the United States and Mexico based on its status in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:42 pm
Docket: 08-267 Title: United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
(for the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia)Size of Family Unit/ Poverty Guidelines /125 Percent1 /$10,400 /$13,0002 /$14,000 /$17,5003 /$17,600 /$22,0004 /$22,200 /$26,5005 /$24,800 /$31,0006 /$28,400 /$35,5007 /$32,000 /$40,0008 /$35,600 /$44,500 [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 11:20 am
When this is approved (6-12 months) you will be a Permanent Resident of the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
The petitioner’s merits brief is due Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
Dugger or the United States Supreme Court cases set forth by Mr. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 12:56 pm
Todo otherwise, would violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendmentsto the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
" Such a result is particularly undesirable, AAI further explains, because the United States is likely to argue that "a price squeeze should be eliminated as an independent antitrust offense" - an issue that AAI "has vigorously contested . . . in its brief" but which respondents did not address. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
Impacts to Biological Resources and Wildlife Habitat Petitioners claimed that the County used an incorrect methodology in evaluating the impacts to biological resources and wildlife habitat, and the County should have used the guidance promulgated by California Department of Fish and Game in cooperation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. [read post]
