Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 8081 - 8100 of 97,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
In that case, fair use was limited to works that transformed the original through use of parody or satire - this is juxtaposes the current environment, which noticeably reduces the rights of photographers in their works through the expansion of fair use, as evident in Cariou v Prince in 2013, and Rentmeester v Nike, Inc. in 2018.This is further explored through an examination of the Andy Warhol case, which further illustrates the expansion of the fair use exception to the detriment… [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
It seems a well established legal principle that it is not for the court to mark its disapproval by depriving the claimant of that to which they are entitled. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
19 Oct 2024, 5:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, I mean, it's pretty bold to take the position without knowing one. [read post]