Search for: "Harding v. State"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 15,901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
Hard to amend constitutional provisions prevent transient majorities from governing in ways that oppress minorities. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:20 am
The case is entitled Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:22 pm
In April, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled in the case Yelp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:15 pm
Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Libel Cases The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released Paulsson v.... [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 6:12 am
It is hard to overstate how unusual such a verdict is. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
(relisted after the March 6, March 20 and March 27 conferences) United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Apple v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am
The court’s unanimous ruling Tuesday in Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
CASE NO. 2: Sardis v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
It's really not that hard to imagine. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
The judge stated that counsel should be able to deal with at least some of these from their own notes. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court's 1993 ruling in Herrera v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 8:59 pm
" State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 12:56 pm
Trump’s immigration officials no doubt remember this history, and it helps explain why they have worked so hard to undermine sanctuary policies. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
It is also worth noting that the federal and state courts have not yet felt a need to cite this Blog, which has to signal something (good) about the continuing acuity and judgment of our hard-working judges. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
It is also worth noting that the federal and state courts have not yet felt a need to cite this Blog, which has to signal something (good) about the continuing acuity and judgment of our hard-working judges. [read post]