Search for: "House v. House"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 41,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:20 pm
The compromise bill, H.R. 6172, was worked out between House leadership as well as the House Judiciary and House Intelligence committees. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
The House committees lack the power to subpoena the president In the House cases, Trump v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:03 am
Kenner v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 9:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
So without further ado, let's take a look at recent commentary and developments.Trade MarksThe Trademark Lawyer and The Fashion Law reported here and here on British comedian Joe Lycett's name change to Hugo Boss, in order to protest what he sees as overly heavy-handed trade mark assertion by fashion company Hugo Boss against small businesses.The Fashion Law also offered context and comment on the “Stopping Harmful Offers on Platforms by Screening Against Fakes in… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm
Strezovski and others v North Macedonia (App. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
Excluding the agency heads cohort, the bill divides the remaining members into four cohorts of 4 members each: the law enforcement cohort (law enforcement/prosecutors) the victim cohort the experts cohort (the legal and technologist experts) the companies cohort To nominally reduce partisanship, each of the following partisan leaders can appoint one member of each of the four cohorts: Senate majority leader, Senate minority leader, Speaker of the House, and House minority leader. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Maguire’s resignation as acting DNI came shortly after Trump rebuked him following a briefing to the House Intelligence Committee by an employee in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) who stated that Russia was interfering in the 2020 election in favor of Trump. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Grix v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:47 am
In the case of Wenk v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
Moreover, in the UK, (in direct contradistinction from the Innsbruck decision) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) (which I discuss briefly here) held that plaintiffs can recover damages for loss of control of their data without proving pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:48 am
Mazars USA and Trump v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for HMMRC, heard 29- 30 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap… [read post]
