Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 19,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Is there room for a "strong" approach? [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:05 am
, Shaw v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 11:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
Cordner v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
So, too, he broke company with the Court’s “conservative” wing in employee speech and student speech cases and likewise took strong exception to the majority opinions in Holder v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Strong and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Holder and Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Chooseco LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
They are especially strong in those areas where Africa is usually considered the perpetual student--Constitutional law and practice high among them. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 10:51 am
Democratic systems are open to multiple sources of information and strong self-correction mechanisms. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
Carhart, effectively reversing a prior decision (Stenberg v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm
Cal.) in X Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:11 am
At issue in the case of G.G. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:33 am
The Court noted the strong public policy against restitution or recoupment of the overpayment of child support, citing Hart v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
The McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
Update: D.C. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
