Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:35 am
In the end, the California Supreme Court ruled in Robey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Thus, in California, while “an FDA[] conclusion is not binding . [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In the end, the California Supreme Court ruled in Robey v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
A subsequent outbreak in California in 1985 confirmed the role of food in disseminating listeriosis. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:33 am
On July 1, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order (pdf) granting, in part, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys fees in Wild Equity Institute v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:12 am
Perez Hilton is being sued in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by a freelance photographer who alleges the gossip blogger posted photos of Glee star Darren Criss on his Web site without the photographer's permission.In the 22-page complaint including counts alleging copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 501 et seq.] and violation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act [17 U.S.C. sec. 1201 et seq.], Robert Caplin v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:52 am
The case of US v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Windsor, the United States asked for the judgment to be affirmed, which should have scuttled the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
