Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 8121 - 8140 of 68,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 2:45 am by Rebecca Daramola (Bristows)
It cited the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow that the wording of the application as filed could be used to interpret the granted claims, but noted that this was irrelevant in 10x Genomics v Curio and therefore required no decision. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:02 pm
The state of Louisiana included the candidates' statements in its latest filing seeking rehearing of Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am by James Bickford
  This morning, the editorial boards of the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times both comment on the Court’s grant of certiorari in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court granted certiorari in Minneci v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by News Desk
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CORVALLIS, OREGON BriefFull CLOSING THE GAPS: FOOD SAFETY EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES IN THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY 2021 2021 2021-05668 Yemmireddy, V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Jeanne Long
  Three of those involved a question arising under Padilla v Kentucky, the 2010 United States Supreme Court case holding that it can be ineffective assistance of counsel for a criminal defense attorney to fail to advise his noncitizen client of the immigration consequences of pending criminal charges. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.htmlOne petition for certiorari was granted on 10/3/22: Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:29 am by Anthony Lake
The New Jersey Law Journal contains an article concerning the continuing struggles of federal district courts to come to terms with the discretion which the Supreme Court granted to them in sentencing in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The other key issue arising from the CJEU’s judgment in the Glawischnig case is the finding on the territorial scope of injunctions granted by Member States; in summary the CJEU held that Member States could issue filtering injunctions against intermediaries with worldwide effect “within the confines of public international law”. [read post]