Search for: "State v. Record" Results 8121 - 8140 of 43,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Furthermore, where the record demonstrates a pattern of default or neglect, the default should be considered intentional and, therefore, not excusable (see Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead v Jablonsky, 283 AD2d 553 [2001]). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 9:07 am by Venkat
Related posts: Redbox Can be Liable Under the Video Privacy Protection Act for Failure to Purge Video Rental Records -- Sterk v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:38 pm
Given the recent ruling United States Supreme Court decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
 . . .Because a review of the sufficiency of the evidence focuses on the quantum of evidence based on an undiminished record, see Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 10:30 am by Fadwa Hammoud
Fadwa Hammoud is the solicitor general of the state of Michigan, which joined an amicus brief on behalf of the petitioner in June Medical Services v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
Michigan’s VRPA provides that a person “engaged in the business of selling at retail, renting, or lending books or other written materials, sound recordings, or video recordings shall not disclose to any person, other than the customer, a record or information concerning the purchase, lease, rental, or borrowing of those materials by a customer that indicates the identity of the customer,” with certain exceptions. [read post]