Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 8,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2008, 11:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:08 am
ChartOne, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:27 am
I've written recently - and not so recently - about how the law deals with people who "annoy, alarm and harass" each other, but that post, and an earlier one, were both about adult conduct.Magistrate Marcia Linsky of the Allen County (Indiana) Superior Court sent me a link to a recent opinion from the Indiana Supreme Court that deals with a very different kind of harassment. . . harassment by a middle school student. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:40 pm
5-17-2008 Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania's Supreme Court justices considered whether a person looking at a book in a library is analogous to a person downloading files from the Internet and whether, in either circumstance, the person is in "control" of the material.The comparison came during arguments in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Is it likely the Supreme Court - or the Superior Court in San Francisco, to which this case should be returning for entry of a final order - would grant a stay? [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:00 am
Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 225, came to a similar conclusion. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:46 am
Doe in court documents. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:27 pm
These cases are directed to the Supreme Court, the superior court of general jurisdiction. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:53 pm
In McWeeny v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
The circuit court does note that it was contrary to the CVRA for the district court to permit and employ an ex parte proceeding that did not allow the victims to participate by conferring in advance of the plea agreement. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:26 am
The "consents and approves" provision does more than illustrate applicable law. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:14 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:49 pm
The court ruled in Down Under Masonry, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:00 pm
In Ybarra v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Ted and Rosella Fields, an 11-page opinion, Judge Mathias writes:A default judgment was entered against Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") in Lake Superior Court on a claim of bad faith filed by policyholders Ted and Rosella Fields ("the Fieldses"). [read post]
7 May 2008, 6:00 am
Velasquez, Supervising Judge of the Orange County Superior Court Complex Civil Panel, issued an interesting order in a wage and hour case, Ybarra v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
