Search for: "Works v. State" Results 8141 - 8160 of 60,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am by Abbie Peterson
The six Plaintiffs worked in various capacities during the construction of the homes within the two subdivisions. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:04 am by Eric
Believe it or not, this is not the first opinion in Westlaw to use the term "Cornholio"--that "honor" is reserved for State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 3:48 pm
 When the United States Supreme Court issued the controversial 5-4 decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:06 am
Probationary employee dismissed on the basis of reports indicating a potential violation of the employer’s rulesMatter of Shabazz v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 63 AD3d 1253The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme dismissing a petition filed by Malik Shabazz seeking a review a determination of Correctional Services’ terminating his employment.Shabazz, who had been appointed as a chaplain, was serving his probationary period. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Probationary employee dismissed on the basis of reports indicating a potential violation of the employer's rulesMatter of Shabazz v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2009 NY Slip Op 04336, decided on June 4, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme dismissing a petition filed by Malik Shabazz seeking a review a determination of Correctional Services' terminating his employment.Shabazz, who had been… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm by M. McClure
On December 7th, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thompson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The investigator ordered a ‘forensic linguistic and Islamic assessment’ of the article, which was carried out by the religious expertise department at the State Committee for Work with Religious Organisations. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:09 am by Kate Fort
Finally, in late March, Texas, which had added two additional states as plaintiffs in the first amended complaint–Indiana and Louisiana–amended their complaint in Texas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
But in the canon of Supreme Court cases, United States v. [read post]