Search for: "Block v. State" Results 8161 - 8180 of 9,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2021, 1:51 pm by admin
Practice & Integrity 1 (2019), available at DOI: 10.35122/jospi.2019.878137 [cited as Soskolne & Baur] [3]  See Watson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:31 am by thejaghunter
Morgan making a cell phone call to state officials, during which he made a police report of the incident to Sergeant Kevin Smith of the Tennessee Highway Patrol. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
For example, judges used to consider implicit (or unwritten) reasons in a decision, and this no longer will be sufficient after the Supreme Court’s decision in Vavilov (see for example, Farrier v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm by Cynthia Wong
While the California Supreme Court has held that a train station is a public forum under the state constitution, even the California court would likely rule that raucous demonstrations can be prohibited in the area right by the train tracks and that protesters have no right to block doors and interrupt train service.However, BART ignored the huge difference between protesting on the BART train platforms and talking about protesting on the BART platforms. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Court set the tone for its robust judicial review of the executive branch in one of the first of these cases, Hamdi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
A case that the Supreme Court will hear in the October, 2022 Term, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm by Margaret Wood
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Supreme Court’s decision that blocked this vaccine-or-test rule. [read post]