Search for: "House v. House" Results 8161 - 8180 of 41,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am by WIMS
      The Appeals Court said, "Pursuant to the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Norton v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The seller set up a situation in which both houses had the parking, but it all got screwed up. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:56 am by tracey
Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in Administration) v CRC Credit Fund Ltd and Others (Financial Services Authority intervening): [2012] UKSC 6: [2012] WLR (D)  53 “The ‘client money pool’ to be distributed among former clients of Lehman Brothers’ London affiliate was not limited to money which had been placed in segregated client accounts, as required by the Financial Services Authority, but extended to identifiable client money which the… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:23 am by Mack Sperling
The "Creation And Development" Claim Wasn't Plausible On the argument about creation and development, Judge Agee, writing for the majority, distinguished the Ninth Circuit's decision in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Richard Gallogly
In a recent unpublished decision in Zoning Board of Appeals of Brookline v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
The first issue concerned whether the Regulation 8(2), Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999, was engaged because of a deficiency in "the" decision. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
The first issue concerned whether the Regulation 8(2), Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999, was engaged because of a deficiency in "the" decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 11:54 am by Brent Wieand
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court began on Tuesday in Health and Hospital Corp. v Talevski. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
Will all, or most, law schools be affected in roughly similar fashion, or will there be starkly different effects on public v. private; or based on geography; or "top tier" v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 8:28 am by Giles Peaker
The agency is not the one charged with the conduct of the litigation, unlike the situation in Kynaston v Carroll [2011] EWHC 2179 (QB). [read post]