Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 26,700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 7:34 am
In Hollins v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
” Alternatively, in A v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
For Education Week, Mark Walsh revisits a landmark school-speech decision, Tinker v. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Disputes over a decedent’s domicile—whether it is a different state, country, or county—typically arise at the early stage of a probate proceeding. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
I am not aware of any court in any other country addressing this issue.The conclusi [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Darius joined Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski shortly after graduating, and he has been avidly defending landowners throughout the country from more than 13 years. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm
Shopoff Land Fund V L.P. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:22 pm
Swahn, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am
And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
” Commonly known as “certificates of demonstrated competency,” these reports contain information on whether a nominee possesses “a useful knowledge of the principal language or dialect of the [receiving] country” and “knowledge and understanding of the history, the culture, the economic and political institutions, and the interests of that country and its people. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
In the death penalty case, Moore v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:26 pm
And while Apple hasn't sued anyone over a SEP yet (thus I haven't had the opportunity to remind them of their FRAND obligations), I lashed out at them when they described a $40 per-device damages claim over five software patents as a "reasonable royalty," given that "reasonable" is the "FR" part of "FRAND" (and the "ND" part wasn't put before the Apple v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Board members were selected to represent EU Member States, EC DGs and agencies, NSC, and industry (notably through BIAC). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:54 pm
The analysis explains how the EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement (IPA) negatively impacts the policy space the EU, EU member states and Singapore have to manage financial instability and prevent financial crises. [read post]
