Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:41 pm
This week, perhaps emboldened by the Supreme Court's recent decision, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California permitted a federal takings claim to proceed despite plaintiffs' failure to pursue a takings claim in State court. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm
United States, waded back into Apprendi land to overrule the long-beleaguered Harris v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:42 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am
(Evergreen) appealed from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (complaint). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
United States, there's little reason to believe that the no-commenting-on-defendants'-silence rule has a historical basis, nor is it a straightforward reading of the text of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:38 am
On June 17, 2013 the United States Supreme Court - in Salinas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:53 am
By Glen Hansen In Freeny v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
The judgment below is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety." [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Townsend and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
By Matthew Hinks The California legislature has declared the availability of housing for every Californian to be a matter of "vital statewide importance." [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Perry, United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
