Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 801 - 820
of 3,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2007, 9:20 am
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
There is a referral pending before the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the EPO on the issue of double-patenting (G 1/19). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
§ 202.27(c), (d). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
”Id. at *19.c. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
§ 202.27(c), (d). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am
A board which has taken a specific decision in ex-parte appeal proceedings may be compelled to directly interfere with its own earlier decision if the same issues are relevant in opposition appeal proceedings (for example, if the same amendments were allowed under Article 123(2) EPC before grant and were attacked under Article 100(c) EPC in opposition). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:44 pm
(c) There shall be an open meeting law advisory commission. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:04 am
” The letter was signed by Senator Orrin G. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:05 am
In an appeal to the Commissioner, the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested and the burden of establishing the facts upon which petitioner seeks relief.The Commissioner said that an examination of these provisions and the record supports the conclusion that Gimbrone failed to meet her burden of proving that she spent more than 40% of her duties in the elementary tenure area.Accordingly, had be matter been considered on its merits, the… [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:45 am
Pettit (Aero Thermo Technology, Inc.) and Wilbur C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board notes further the undisputed fact that substantially all conceivable embodiments of the display pack defined in the granted claims 5 to 7 (which are formally not dependent from claim 1) appear also to be subject-matter of claim 1 as granted. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
In G 1/93 […] it is stated that “If a European patent as granted contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed within the meaning of A 123(2) and which also limits the scope of protection conferred by the patent, such patent cannot be maintained in opposition proceedings unamended, because the ground for opposition under A 100(c) prejudices the maintenance of the patent. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 2:30 pm
§ 101 (i.e., process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
§ 2.142(g), the Board held that Mr. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm
§ 2.142(g), the Board held that Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
IN THE MATTER OF K.A.N., J.B. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Even though by itself not decisive (“whether or not a method is excluded from patentability under A 53(c) cannot depend on the person carrying it out” G 1/07 [3.4.1] see also G 1/04 discussed therein), this criterion gives a further indication that the claimed method might fall under the exclusion clause. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
C. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Code] §1030(g). [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:40 pm
In C v Health Service Provider [2008] PrivCmrA 3 a health service provider disclosed details of a letter from a member's relative to the member.The matter was resolved by an apology to the relative by the provider. [read post]
