Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 801 - 820
of 51,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Dudley-Baton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am
The grant of a privacy injunction in the case of AMC v News Group Newspapers ([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) has unleashed a deluge of largely inaccurate media comment worthy of the “super injunction spring” of 2011. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:23 am
Sandford (1857)The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)Lochner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 8:23 am
” Case Citation: Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:18 pm
People v O.X. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:08 am
From the Supreme Court’s opinion last week in FEC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:01 am
The case involves whether people who are children... [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:22 pm
"Makes sense.But here's the thing that doesn't make sense: That we're having this whole fight over $440.California had to pay for (1) defendant's appointed appellate counsel (plus his counsel in the expungement proceeding), (2) the five lawyers on the caption in this case from the Attorney General's Office, and (3) the salaries of all the people in the Court of Appeal who worked on this matter. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:58 pm
It's a case from San Diego, and involves two boys -- nine-year old Jonathan, and his brother, thirteen-year old Charles -- who went out on a bike ride and never returned. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Sometimes I talk about how a case doesn't seem all that different from other cases that do not result in the death penalty. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
The California Attorney General confessed error, and the Court of Appeal reverses.Presumably making this guy (among others) incredibly happy:P.S. - The name of the defendant in this case is Sean Patrick M. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:23 am
For example, I'm not going to recite the facts that ultimately resulted in a case over which the California Supreme Court ultimately granted review. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
You don't see many 82-page opinions by the California Court of Appeal in run-of-the-mill child molestation cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 7:22 pm
" This is one of those cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
Consequently, if King technically 'serves' the three distinct sentences imposed in this case, they would each mandate a separate sentencing enhancement in the event he is convicted of another felony in the future. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 12:46 pm
In December, the Supreme Court will hear arguments for CVS v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
I agree with Justice Perren that the prosecutor's extended reference to 9/11 in this case was error, and also thought that Justice Perren (rightly) took the underlying issue seriously.That said, the opinion highlights the problem of prosecutorial misconduct and the wholesale inability -- or unwillingness -- of the judiciary to do much about it. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm
Or, as in this case, for serving such people? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
You can’t have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams. [read post]
