Search for: "Civil Rights Cases" Results 801 - 820 of 61,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2025, 6:52 am by Ryan Mulvey
Commission on Civil Rights under Exemption 5, it had failed to meet the foreseeable-harm standard by not connecting “two comments . . . about two lines of a 24-page” document to the asserted “broader harm of weakened inter agency relationships” or the internal “chill” of agency deliberations.Webb v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:36 am by Rory Mir
What do you see as the role of technologists in defending civil liberties with local communities? [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
They framed the case, not as being about “the rights of the Chinese race” but about those of all children “born in this country …. without regard to the country from which their parents came. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:24 am by Evan Bernick
I'm thinking in particular of the citation of Mark Shawhan's 10-page student comment suggesting the possibility of a domicile requirement, based primarily on a statement made by Senator Lyman Trumbull about the Civil Rights Act of 1866. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Andrew Flavelle Martin
Unethical behaviour seldom results from lack of knowledge about what is right or wrong”.[17] In parallel, civility and professionalism solely as an intuitive skill ungrounded in knowledge may also be insufficient. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 3:50 am by Drew M. Capuder
The key sources of authority are: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 3:50 pm by Jonathan Wolf
Jonathan Wolf is a civil litigator and author of Your Debt-Free JD (affiliate link). [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 3:41 pm
” Representing the federal government, Kyle Hawkins told the justices that their cases “emphasized that rights-creating statutes are atypical. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 3:10 pm
If you sign it, you give up all of your rights to sue and pursue civil remedies. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 3:00 pm
Despite the tone of the dissents, Barrett’s opinion seems to resolve the case on grounds that will not resonate widely in civil RICO litigation. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 1:54 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has an existing referral process whereby the FTC must first consult with the USAG before filing a case in federal court for civil penalties. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 11:37 am by Dylan Gibbs
If the X case is any indication, Disney made the right call backing away from that argument after facing public backlash. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 11:35 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
On April 1st, the Ministry of the Attorney General released its Civil Rules Review Consultation Paper. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:21 am by Patricia Hughes
In the case of Perkins Coie, the Department of Justice (unsuccessfully) sought the recusal of the judge assigned to the case, Judge Beryl Howell, who issued a temporary bar to certain parts of the EO, a limitation Perkins Coie requested in order to address the more significant parts first. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 5:52 am by Reference Staff
Small is a veteran civil litigator who has tried many landmark cases during his time as a federal prosecutor. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 4:29 am by Weronika Galka
The cuts eliminated the entire staff of a program that helps low-income households pay utility bills, as well as senior civil service leaders and workers in other roles. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 11:19 pm by Béligh Elbalti
She took a Kantian rights-based approach to explain that the idea of right and remedy essentially merged or ‘shaded into’ one another. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 10:08 pm by Béligh Elbalti
 “Clarify/clarification” here is a term in Chinese Civil Procedure Law, analogous to a judge’s right in other civil legal systems–the “right to ask, suggest to or require the parties to clarify or supplement their ambiguous, insufficient or improper claims, submissions or evidence. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
Drawing on those sources, this Article argues that modern understandings of the right to family integrity were forged through legal challenges to the state’s growing power to remove children from their parents, in the name of child welfare, from the Civil War through the Progressive Era. [read post]