Search for: "Ex Parte United States" Results 801 - 820 of 5,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 4:43 pm by Steve Lubet
"   The Supreme Court is the only one in the United States never to have adopted a code of conduct, and it has remained silent in the face of controversies involving justices, on the left and right. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm by Gideon
So, let’s start at the very beginning: The statements in question do not implicate the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:31 pm by Robert Chesney
—In carrying out the policy set forth in subsection (a), the United States shall plan, develop, and demonstrate response options to address the full range of potential cyber attacks on United States interests that could be conducted by potential adversaries of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Ask the judges in Harris County.Central Unit property an undocumented necropolisHere's a postscript to the closure of TDCJ's Central Unit in Sugar Land, which long-time readers will recall was the first prison unit closed in the Lone Star State since the founding of the (Texan) Republic. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:10 pm
Military divorce is an issue that has received too little attention here in Orange County and elsewhere around the nation despite the fact that the United States is now fighting three wars. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
Chief Rabbi, ex parte Wachmann [1992] 1 WLR 1036, QBD the then Simon Brown J stated at 1042-3: “[T]he court is hardly in a position to regulate what is essentially a religious function – the determination whether someone is morally and religiously fit to carry out the spiritual and pastoral duties of his office. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Part IV of the opinion for the Court by CJ Roberts in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:10 am by Bruce Zagaris
  These actions on the part of the ICC, in turn, threaten to infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States and imped the critical national security and foreign policy work of the United States Government and allied officials, and thereby threaten the national security and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:10 am by Bruce Zagaris
  These actions on the part of the ICC, in turn, threaten to infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States and imped the critical national security and foreign policy work of the United States Government and allied officials, and thereby threaten the national security and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:00 am by Grayson Clary
Or as one of the members of an American Bar Association working group warned more colorfully, “[I]f a country plotting a political murder in the United States were to ensure that some small part of the wrongful act ... took place abroad, no suit could be brought against the responsible foreign state in the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:08 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  All of this is inconsistent with traditional notions of the role of law, the scope of corporate governance and the nature of corporate social responsibility int he United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:55 am by Jim Gerl
Seal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Photo credit: Wikipedia) It pays to read those footnotes! [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:01 pm by Jim Gerl
              The issue of related services has resulted in two decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 11:24 am by Josh Blackman
United States (582-592) Ex Part Endo (592-597) Class 10: Easements I Creation of Easements: Willard v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 9:58 pm
   You may read the entire opinion by clicking the link here, The case number is 08-1409 and the name is United States, ex rel. [read post]