Search for: "State ex rel. Justice v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Rumsfeld (542 U.S. 507 (2004)), as did Judge Michael Mukasey in Padilla ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:50 pm
In addition, the United States has filed a lawsuit under the False Claims Act against former True Health CEO Christopher Grottenthaler and others, which is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:34 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
Eisentrager and United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
As an initial matter, the Court of Appeal explained that under People ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
The case is titled United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
At issue in the case, No. 06-1269, United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
STEPHANIE KAY LANNINGon writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit[June 7, 2010] Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
US ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm
State law now requires every law enforcement agency to implement an “early warning system. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
On the other end of the spectrum there are companies that generate all or almost all of their IAP revenues in a country like Turkey or the UK, be it because the functionality and/or content of their apps is of interest only to customers in those target markets or because they just happened to get more traction there.To sum it up, the effective App Store tax that a developer pays on a particular IAP transaction is the percentage of ex-VAT (and ex-sales-tax) proceeds from users that… [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
However, in the recent case of Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No.2) ([2010] UKSC 26) the Court reached the opposite conclusion, upholding an order which had been made at the outset of the hearing. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 1:46 pm
The case is State ex rel. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:14 am
In G. ex rel. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:02 am
The concurring opinion in State ex rel. [read post]
