Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 801 - 820
of 7,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
Holder, holding that Congress acted within its authority in passing legislation that restored copyright in certain foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Interesting D.C. Circuit Dissent Regarding Computer Monitoring for Jan. 6 Trespasser
9 Aug 2024, 5:14 pm
Moreover, the First Amendment significantly limits the government's ability to prohibit speech that is false, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
Holder, Hui v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:28 am
But compared to last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
Case Background In the case before the Supreme Court, Kucana v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm
In Syncora Guarantee Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
The City of Pikeville appealed a decision from the state’s Court of Appeals, which held that concealed carry permits issued by the state allow permit-holders to carry weapons within federally protected school zones. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:16 am
Gutsier, No. 10-1542, and Holder v. [read post]
Myong Nam Kim v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City (Md. Ct. of Spec. Appeals)
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
BeachleySummary: Three Class B-D-7 beer, wine, and liquor license holders (the “Licensees”) in Baltimore City (the “City”) were cited for violating a statute that (i) allowed Class B beer, wine, and liquor license holders in a certain area of the City to exchange their licenses for Class B-D-7 licenses, provided that the license holder executed a memorandum of understanding with a local community association; and (ii) restricted the hours of… [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 4:38 am
Why Wolverine should never scratch his nose…Marvel Enterprises, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
See Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:49 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:49 am
In Park v Nichols, 2011 Ga. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am
In Continental Automotive GmbH et al v. iBiquity Digital Corporation, the plaintiff held a license from the patent holder. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:18 pm
” eBay Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:21 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Mohamed v. [read post]
