Search for: "State v. Prince" Results 801 - 820 of 1,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Acuff-Rose case, where the court explained that the more an unauthorized derivative work is transformative, the more likely such use is fair under §107 of the Copyright Act (p. 13).Transformative works can be mash-ups, remixes, fan-fiction, fan-made videos, or can also be works of visual arts which incorporate elements of previous works, such as Richard Prince’s CanalZone series which led in the U.S. to the much debated Cariou v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:42 am by emagraken
Northern Health Authority (Prince George Regional Hospital), 2010 BCSC 1817; Schwartz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:09 am by Thomas James
Lynn Goldsmith took a photograph of Prince in her studio in 1981. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
The opinion they joined (in another 5-4 decision with just this lineup) in Iqbal v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Angel [sic] Kelley's order today in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
"It appears that at least some in the Senate also support adding trustees.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Twitter said that the National Archives will not be allowed to resurrect Donald Trump’s tweets, even in its official capacity as a record-keeping organization. [read post]