Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court" Results 801 - 820 of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2021, 4:17 pm
Justice Labrosse of the Superior Court of Justice held that, because he was convicted of murdering his parents, Cameron Rogers was not entitled to the benefits under their wills. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm by Michael Webster
Karakatsanis of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting as the Divisional Court, dated April 27, 2009.ARMSTRONG J.A. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Laura Valade
ARCAP Rule 9(c) states: A notice of appeal or cross-appeal filed after the superior court announces an order or other form of decision – but before entry of the resulting judgment that will be appealable – is treated as filed on the date of, and after the entry of, the judgment. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Laura Valade
ARCAP Rule 9(c) states: A notice of appeal or cross-appeal filed after the superior court announces an order or other form of decision – but before entry of the resulting judgment that will be appealable – is treated as filed on the date of, and after the entry of, the judgment. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Laura Valade
ARCAP Rule 9(c) states: A notice of appeal or cross-appeal filed after the superior court announces an order or other form of decision – but before entry of the resulting judgment that will be appealable – is treated as filed on the date of, and after the entry of, the judgment. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
White, 781 A.2d 85 (New Jersey Superior Court 2001)). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 11:35 am by Holly Brezee
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), System Studies & Simulation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:00 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Appeal Judge’s Decision Ellis-Don appealed the arbitrator’s decision to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
  And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers continue to discuss the Supreme Court’s recent announcement that it will hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am by Alex Phipps
The court found no abuse of discretion as “[t]he superior court made supported findings to resolve purported contradictions between the competing experts. [read post]