Search for: "United States v. Chambers" Results 801 - 820 of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
That is in form exactly the same rationale that the Court has used in the past -- most notably, in Austin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:24 pm by Timothy Lee, Jr
From their site: The Oyez Project is a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am by Adam Wagner
The court applies the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice in Bressol v Gouvernement de la Communauté Française (Case C-73/08). [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  About a century ago, reformers throughout the nation were in the thick of a contentious national movement to bring about popular election not of presidents, but of United States senators. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Bill Olson – 1 Promoted Comment The United States government’s position in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:09 am by Steve Lubet
It goes far deeper than that and has much more significant implications for freedom of religion in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
Written by Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, whose bust sits inside the entrance to the Old Supreme Court Chamber in the United States Capitol, this opinion declared that African Americans were not citizens of the United States and could not sue in Federal courts. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:39 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Elspeth Berry, The Zone of Interaction Between Partnerships, LLPs and Human Rights in United Kingdom LawSandy Ghandhi, Human Rights and the International Court of Justice The Ahmadou Sadio Diallo CaseElizabeth Wicks, A, B, C v Ireland: Abortion Law under the European Convention on Human RightsStephen Skinner, The Right to Life, Democracy and State Responsibility in ‘Urban Guerilla’ Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber Judgment in… [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Beth Van Schaack
  The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:24 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm by John Ellis
United States Department of Labor, et al., Case # 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, which was consolidated with Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]