Search for: "State v. Fair" Results 8181 - 8200 of 27,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 12:37 pm
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires workers to be compensated for all hours worked, unless they are specifically exempted. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:43 pm by Sheppard Mullin
District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted Revolution’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of United States Patent RE 37,545 (‘545 patent) in Aspex Eyewear, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:19 pm
  The ticket's worth only $2, so you'd think that the amount in controversy requirement wouldn't be satisfied and we'd have to be in state court. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:09 am
’”I understand that there are occasional cases that so state, but that attitude seems flatly wrong to me. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
These laws are relevant because of the USSC decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:57 pm by ---------------------------------
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which sits above the federal courts in Ohio, issued its opinion in Franklin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am by Steve Gottlieb
It was reported recently that the current Administration is trying to eliminate so-called disparate impact cases under the Fair Housing Act.[1] The press reported it as forcing plaintiffs to prove intent to discriminate. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm by NL
On the fair trial issue, it was clearly possible for there to be a fair trial. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm by NL
On the fair trial issue, it was clearly possible for there to be a fair trial. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by slemberg
The lawsuit alleges that the debt buyer and debt collector violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and related state law by engaging in the robo-signing of affadavits. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Konzelman, 158 N.J. 185, 193 (1999) (stating that voluntary agreements “enabl[e] parties to order their personal lives consistently with their post-marital responsibilities” and, therefore, are given “prominence and weight”); Conforti v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Including the final section of the opinion (Section X), which states in its entirety: "We commend the trial judge, the Honorable Brian R. [read post]