Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 19,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
Inst. v Rivkin Radler LLP, 101 AD3d 651 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
Akanoc removed some of these sites but, according LVMH's amended complaint, several infringing websites were still in operation as of last summer.Regarding proof of contributory infringement the Supreme Court in Inwood Labs, Inc v Ives Labs, Inc stated that "if a supplier of a manufacturer or distributor intentionally induces another to infringe a trade mark, or if it continues to supply its product to one whom it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trade… [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
Lapine v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Techdirt) Assigning a mark without the business: a question of deception? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 5:04 pm
The Fed's announcement also stated that the initial eligibility will be limited to domestic MMMFs who can meaningfully participate in the program. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm
On 1 October 2024, Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, appeared before a Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, marking his first appearance since he was released from Belmarsh Prison in June after pleading guilty to one count of violating the Espionage Act. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:07 pm
Co., 10 AD3d 778, 780-781 [2004], affd 5 NY3d 467 [2005] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Clayburn v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
Copyright © 2009 Mark Bennett. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
In Water Splash v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern worries that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s decision to join the dissenting opinion in Monday’s racial-gerrymandering decision, Cooper v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
[New Mexico v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:43 pm
The decision is one of the first Circuit Court decisions to address punitive damages availability in a Jones Act or unseaworthiness action since the Supreme Court of the United States’ land mark decision in Atlantic Soundings v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
Auth. v.] [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:36 pm
Mutual v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Based upon these observations, the Court held a single color is not protectable in the fashion industry and, in consideration of its findings under federal law, the Court held Louboutin was unlikely to succeed on its state law claims. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman considers how the issues in Gundy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Br. at 8 (citing State v. [read post]
