Search for: "Brown v. State" Results 8201 - 8220 of 8,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
Invalidation of affirmative action as a matter of constitutional law will mark yet another break with the civil rights tradition that began with Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:30 pm by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
According to the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board, work-related psychiatric injuries are only compensable if your employer is liable for the injury. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am by Guest Author
At the oral arguments in two currently pending Supreme Court cases—United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
And in 1990 David Souter refused to state his position on Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:50 am by gA
"Gutiérrez, Víctor Samuel c/ Estado Nacional" (Fallos 300:1092, 1978)Sentó principios fundamentales sobre la responsabilidad del Estado por actividad ilícita. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:29 am
The DEA 2010 was passed during the 2010 Parliamentary 'wash-up' (an accelerated parliamentary process used after the general election was called by Labour Leader Gordon Brown to rush pending legislation through Parliament before dissolution). [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Jones is not up for re-election until 2020, but he represents a deep-red state. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Sedor
Jim Merrill Pleads Guilty to Misconduct, Agrees to Assist Investigators in Statehouse Corruption ProbeCharleston Post and Courier – Glenn Smith and Andrew Brown | Published: 9/1/2017 South Carolina Rep. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm by sydniemery
Brown, Winning the Waiting Game: How Oklahoma Can Rectify the Discrepancy Between Its No-Impeachment Rule and Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
 Oh, important conservatives cracked now and then--Judge Bork waffled on Griswold and Professor McConnell wrote a stunningly honest attempt at an originalist justification of Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]