Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2022, 11:54 am
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court began on Tuesday in Health and Hospital Corp. v Talevski. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
What is deplorable here is not that a company should be trying to maximise the power of its trade marks. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Citing Packingham, Atkinson argued that Facebook has (as the court summarized) “a quasi-monopolistic power over a quintessential public forum…. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:12 am
In Ayuluk v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:20 pm
Breyer made repeated efforts on Wednesday to keep open the chances that an $18 million settlement of a major copyright dispute may yet get a full hearing on its fairness in federal court, but he found little support among other members of the Supreme Court as they pondered the scope of a federal court’s power over copyright lawsuits in Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
Even if it did, was the use of the power proportionate to the legitimate aim? [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:10 pm
All of this would equally apply to a contingency at the State level, like the one which V Venkatesan points out. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
On Monday the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 1:03 pm
Congress has no power to establish voter qualifications—certainly not under the Elections Clause, as the Supreme Court said in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm
The Court held in 2008’s Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
Through a reading of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:51 am
The Supreme Court's decision in *National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:50 am
A key issue in the case is this line from Tennessee Electric Power Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm
FTC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
Such a law would not be a "proper" exercise of federal power because it intrudes upon state sovereignty. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 10:27 am
Bank v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am
Case Citation: Cub Club Investment, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:31 pm
That Congress may not use even its spending power to coerce or commandeer states was also expressly affirmed in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 10:35 am
The offering documents grant Epsilon two separate authorities–the power to suspend redemptions and the power to delay redemptions (two very common provisions). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
" Surveying the Supreme Court's jurisprudence, the Court deemed it clear that a state's "‘visitorial powers' and "its power to enforce the law are two different things," and the National Bank Act "pre-empts only the former. [read post]
