Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 8,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2008, 5:48 am
What does that mean? [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 pm
" Shaw v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:00 am
Superior Court, case no. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),Grand (IP)… [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:08 pm
Plaintiff argued its mark is instead suggestive and, therefore, inherently distinctive, and that it had acquired secondary meaning in any event.Under Local Rule 7(h), defendants need not (and may not) respond unless the court requests that it do so.The case cite is The Christensen Firm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Larry Goodman said the question was irrelevant. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:49 am
A recent case, Krinsky v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
On January 30, 2008, the Supreme Court granted review in Reid v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Superior Court (Rothert), 66 Cal. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:21 pm
POST (Sacramento Superior Court Action No. 03CS01077). [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
Superior Court (United Conservation Water Dist.), case no. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
The doctrine on this is a bit complicated, but I think it is fair to say that the four leading Supreme Court cases --- Raley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
They took the position that the statute "does not preclude States from imposing different or additional remedies, but only different or additional requirements. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:24 am
A good example of this dynamic at work can be seen in Judge Young’s just released ruling out of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Bunch v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Unfortunately, this doctrine does not apply in the digital realm because its rationale fails. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Class actions in California's state superior courts went down, while class actions in California's federal courts went up. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 9:31 pm
This question was recently considered in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision of Iasenza v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 3:54 am
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
