Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 8221 - 8240 of 11,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Currently, non-compete contracts are regulated by state law: three states (California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, as well as the District of Columbia) outright ban their enforcement, aside from a few narrow exceptions. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
The more interesting question is, what happens to these cases once they make their way out of the clerk's office? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In addition to its primary holding that psychological, social and economic impacts are not cognizable under CEQA, the Court rendered a few other interesting rulings, including its application of the Supreme Court’s recent “”CEQA-in-reverse” decision (California Building Industry Ass. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
His analysis of the result in LAC Minerals Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A few states, notably California, generally prohibit post-employment noncompetes. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 2:28 am by centerforartlaw
In 1937, the Leffmans fled from Germany to Italy, arranging for the painting (one of their few remaining assets) to be held [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Courtney Minick
Said and United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Yet very few people read those opinions or even know that they exist, and when they do read them, whether as admirers or critics of Thomas, they don’t see what’s in them. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 12:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
An excerpt from yesterday's en banc decision, written by Judge Morgan Christen, in Project Veritas v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by royblack
The Justice Building was re-named a few years ago after the former State Attorney Richard Gerstein. [read post]