Search for: "State v. David"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 14,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 9:03 pm
Lochner v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
Marshaling evidence of racial discrimination in voting from three recent cases, David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center argues that if the Court grants cert. in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
David Bernstein (Debvoise & Plimpton) who acted on behalf of Yves Saint Laurent declared: "We are happy to have achieved a victory in defending against Louboutin's lawsuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
Professor David Rosen This is an academic discourse on the subject of ‘blasphemy’. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Thornton (Nossaman LLP, Irvine, California, appearing pro hac vice) for the City, and David B. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
I’ll note at the outset that of course this broadly remedial rationale for the legality of its discrimination is not being urged by the University of Texas (making it unlikely that the Court could invoke it), that adopting it would also require the Court to toss aside a lot of case law (including, as discussed below, Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
David Brunori weighs in: Governor Jay Nixon has reconvened a commission to study tax credits in the state. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
The book also offers a reading of Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:07 am
., 2012 v, 166 p. ; 25 cm. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
In a 21-page Memorandum Decision following a lengthy bench trial in Chiu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
In a 21-page Memorandum Decision following a lengthy bench trial in Chiu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
” David C. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:28 pm
In the courts Keyu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 11:38 am
For more info, click on Youth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am
The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm
Its general rule, Article 4 (1), points to the law of the state in which the damage occured, i.e. either the state of the investors’ home or that of their bank accounts. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:01 pm
Police seizure of text messages violated 4th Amendment, judge rules [Ars Technica – Jon Brodkin] Savage's decision in State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
Coverage also centers around the results of the Court’s decision this past Term in United States v. [read post]
