Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 3:25 pm
However, in April 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled on this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:33 am
Apple now highlighted some of what Samsung wrote in its response to Ericsson's complaint.With little more than a week to go (unless there is another extension, which is unlikely because the last one was rather long), the ITC keeps getting interesting and relevant input concerning this case and the overarching SEP-related issues in it, including letters from bipartisan groups of United States Senators and United States Representatives.Here's Apple's May 22 filing: … [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:16 pm
This sanction applies a royalty rate of between .80% and .85% to Rambus's total United States sales. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am
These questions have not been clearly resolved in this particular context under United States law. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
In Metrish v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
Motorola in Seattle and its affirmance by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (this circuit also includes California), San Jose-based Senior District Judge Ronald Whyte granted a preliminary injunction based on a summary judgment finding in RealTek's favor on Realtek's allegation that LSI and Agere breached their FRAND licensing obligation by seeking an ITC exclusion order without previously offering a license on FRAND terms.This is the first time for… [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
Arzoumanian v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:41 am
I’ve had Presidents of the United States attack me - by name! [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Hu, Asenqua, Inc., Asenqua Capital Management, LLC, AQC Asset Management, Ltd., and Fireside Capital Management, Ltd.Case number: 09-cv-1177 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: March 18, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 26, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-48 SEC v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:01 am
Lerner, who heads the IRS’s tax-exemption division, described the targeting campaign as a misguided attempt to deal with a wave of applications after the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am
The TOS and the relationship between you and Yahoo shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. . . . [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:00 am
(filed 04/08/13) Amici Curiae Brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
