Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2006, 10:07 am
The case is Baby v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:38 am
Ribstein has a thoughtful post on what he calls the "shareholder democracy sham" and how those efforts interface with the "battle for control" (my words) between states like Delaware and the SEC (as well as the federal courts) over... [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 7:43 am
(Philip Morris v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 12:15 am
"The idea of a liberal democratic constitutional state gradually triumphed in domestic politics over the spirit of the German Volk, and then they triumphed militarily and in foreign policy through the disarming of the battling army. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 8:46 am
Kim Woo Ki, chairman of Elpreya, stated that the brand name Starpreya was derived from the name Freja, a Norse goddess. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 5:07 am
" Kaufhold v. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 10:38 am
Tomorrow's battle in Austin between the Buckeyes and the Longhorns isn't just a game between the nation's top football teams but also between the two highest grossing college athletic programs in the country. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 4:10 am
There's also a scholarly (as usual) sequel to Chris Wadlow's earlier article on the harmonisation of unfair competition, not to mention Part 1 of a state-of-the-art grey goods and trade mark law feature by leading Scottish practitioner Gill Grassie.For good measure, there are case notes on three of the year's biggest legal cases: the US patent injunction decision in eBay v MercExchange and the UK Da Vinci and O2/3 (Bubbles) battles. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
August 24, 2006Re: Professor X And The Conservative Judges Of Reagan And The Two Bushes.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 10:54 am
Referring to what he obviously views as the misguided decisions of the Supreme Court in Hamdan and Judge Taylor in ACLU v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 10:15 am
This is just the opening shot in what promises to be a long battle. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 3:02 pm
In Mandel v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
It is relatively simple to state that there must be an acceptable relation between the legitimate destructive effect and undesirable collateral effects. [read post]
13 Jul 2006, 8:29 am
Arbitration opponents have lost the major legal battles. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In We Were Soldiers, a battalion commander recounts the Battle of Ia Drang, and in the preface to his book, lists those who died in the battle - on both sides. [read post]
6 May 2006, 5:32 pm
Bean v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
16 Nov 2005, 11:20 pm
(See Roper v. [read post]
4 Sep 2005, 5:43 pm
The battle continued, and the Vermont Supreme Court will be hearing Miller's appeal this week, and the Court of Appeals of Virgina will hear Jenkins' appeal next week.Of note is that both sides are waving federal laws to support their cases: Miller's attorney is relying on DOMA to support the claim that Virginia is not obligated to recognize the relationship or the judgments related to dissolution, while Jenkins' attorney is relying on the Parental Kidnapping Prevention… [read post]
