Search for: "GUESS v. GUESS" Results 8241 - 8260 of 8,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I thought the market could fix everything—I guess that only works for some people.) [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
  Especially after the opinions of Judges Sutton and Silberman – two conservative stalwarts – the guessing in the halls of legal academe favored at least a six-to-three if not an eight-to-one vote upholding the Act, with the Chief Justice writing. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Now that Donald Trump has secured the Republican nomination, won federal court rulings making it extremely unlikely he will be disqualified from seeking office, and apparently established that even a felony conviction will not torpedo his campaign, the time has truly come for a careful analysis of his campaign’s immigration policy proposals. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
The Supreme Court has never adopted the theory (indeed, it has previously rejected it), but recently agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
This is potentially a cost of $6.5 million a year for Canadian taxpayers, which seems absurd in view of the Supreme Court of Canada's CCH v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:56 am by Doorey
Health Services and the 2008 decision in Fraser v. [read post]