Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 8241 - 8260
of 13,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 4:49 pm
The best evidence will be sales of houses which are comparable to yours (e.g., in your area, of like size, etc.). [read post]
3 May 2008, 1:45 am
If we are going to have our own data to compare to any private data trotted out in public policy debates, we're going to need to rethink the incentives within higher education to produce our own studies. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
See, e.g., Diatchenko v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:39 pm
Central in the debate over the lawfulness of the Bachmann campaign's use of the logo is a question we have pondered on DuetsBlog before (e.g., here, here, and here), namely, whether the use of another's logo crosses the legal line and is likely to cause confusion as to sponsorship, affiliation, approval, or endorsement, or whether it may constitute lawful nominative fair use. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
E.g., suppose the US denied only allowed foreign taxes to be deducted, not credited, but lowered the tax rate for FSI to 10%. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
" The taxpayer had contended that the award was not taxable because she had suffered physical injury (e.g., the bruxism). [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
Second, if Mukasey were to declare that waterboarding is torture, such a conclusion would, in effect, be a conspicuous public repudiation of the legal analysis confirmed by Stephen Bradbury, who the President has just re-nominated to be Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm
They paid good money, an eight-figure sum, to keep this under wraps, but they’re not getting the benefit of their bargain. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:51 am
And if you’re interested in seeing your firm’s listings here, please feel free to reach out… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:42 am
Justice Scalia is making two points here, and they're both false. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
See e.g., Samples v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:20 am
"We're going to make the transition. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 12:02 pm
Should employers scramble to re-write their non-compete agreements? [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
On the other hand, non-combat PTSD stressors (e.g. serious car accidents, training accidents) must be corroborated to establish service connection. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 2:06 pm
Just as the FCC is suggesting the re-imposition of more stringent and detailed public interest requirements (see our summary here), broadcasters cannot afford to be hit by a new cost of doing business that could in theory take a large percentage of their gross revenue. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:50 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Court re-examines its decision in Floyd v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 12:57 pm
See, e.g., In Re Meyer & Judd, 1 F. 2d 513, 526 (W.D. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 3:40 am
Well, if you’re considering any vaccination mandate or program in your workplace, the employment laws with which you are more familiar (e.g., Title I of the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) have similar accommodation rules. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 11:58 pm
One way to deal with, or at least mitigate, the inefficiencies associated with this sort of fragmentation is cooperation between agencies (e.g. the FTC and DOJ on merger enforcement. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:36 pm
Major reason: they're looking for more tuition money. [read post]
