Search for: "State v. Country" Results 8241 - 8260 of 26,700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
Rosner and Markowitz, however, like the leftist intellectuals of the 1950s who could not bring themselves to criticize Stalin, seem blind to the sorry state of workplace safety in communist countries. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am by Jo Dale Carothers
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:19 am by Ilya Somin
This is despite the fact that no terrorists from the targeted countries have killed anyone in a terrorist attack in the United States in more than four decades, and no legal permanent resident from those countries has ever even tried to carry out a U.S. terrorist attack.... [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:17 am by Jim Singer
U.S. patent law states that any invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent” is not eligible for patent protection. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The criminalization drove rich women out of state or even the country, and poor women, like Penny in Dirty Dancing, to butchers in back alleys. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, Jan. 30 at 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will hold A discussion on the 2019 Missile Defense Review featuring a keynote address from Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans, and Capabilities James H. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:07 am by Samuel Cohen
This was approved in the case of Thema International Fund v HSBC International Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:19 am by Peter Mahler
In our country, we have federal, state, and local statutes designed to protect employees against gender discrimination including sexual harassment and hostile workplace environment. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]