Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 40,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2022, 11:41 am
Naranjo is the latest in an increasingly long line of employee-friendly decisions coming down from the California Supreme Court, including: Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
See Saada v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
See Saada v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
The court says that the plaintiff properly pled extortion under Utah state law: “Defendants do not describe any legitimate benefit they receive for refusing to take down inaccurate reviews, or reviews based on matters already resolved. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm
The Windsor decision struck down a key part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that denied federal marital benefits to same-sex couples who already were legally married under state laws. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 9:56 am
Wilson v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 1:33 am
v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Given the fundamental question it poses regarding an electorate’s right to amend its own state constitution, Schuette v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 8:55 am
Nebraska, which struck down restrictions on the teaching of foreign language. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:41 pm
(See Goss v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:32 am
In 1991, the Supreme Court said in Wyatt v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:10 pm
Circuit ruling in Doe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 6:02 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:00 pm
”That must have dogged them all.# # #DECISIONC. v O'R. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
CU raised an interesting argument: that the regulation is like the one struck down by the Supreme Court in NAACP v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 5:16 am
The case, Wolfinger v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:16 pm
In doing so, Stossel states "we slow down as we age" and "maybe 25 year olds can do it better. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Supreme Court probes FTC’s approach to seeking ill-gotten gains (Lawrence Hurley, Reuters) Supreme Court Decides Chicago v. [read post]
