Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2013, 9:47 pm
On May 7, 2013, the United States Tax Court issued an opinion that can be used as a reminder for a tax lawyer or other professional in John C. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm
This system reflects the complicated religious/secular marriage traditions in the United States. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:37 am
Businesses should take note of this week’s decision in Gormley v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
Rules Against Patent Play by Google’s Motorola Unit http://t.co/6gr69YiIEf -> Dr. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:22 pm
Robart's Microsoft v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:03 pm
See Morales v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 9:42 am
The Florida case is a rare exception in which a delay is convenient for Apple.The next Apple-Google trial in the United States is now (absent another rescheduling) going to be held in October 2013. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am
The United States Senate recently passed a bill, which is now under consideration in the House of Representatives, requiring on-line retailers to collect use tax on behalf of states whose residents are failing to pay the use tax when they make an out-of-state purchase using the internet. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:43 am
The United States District Courts for the Northern and Central Districts of California granted defendants’ motions and dismissed the complaints. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:17 am
In McDaniel v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:39 am
Sure, Nazaire is trying to make a point that the decisions of a United States District Judge in one state do not dictate the decisions of a United States District Judge in another state. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
Clarifying the holding in United States v. [read post]
