Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
Private parties have been instrumental in proposing or funding a large number of the United States’ most iconic monuments, such as the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:02 pm
While his removal proceedings were pending, his United States citizen wife filed an immigrant petition (I-130) on his behalf. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
MUKASEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL No. 06-1181 United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
The petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that the issues were raised at the administrative level. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
United States, 501 U. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:55 pm
Circuit, petition for certiorari, brief in opposition, and petitioner’s reply. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:58 pm
I wanted to focus on a small aspect of the analysis in both cases: The Court finally seemed to separate the jurisdictional questions of whether a federal court can assert jurisdiction and consider a habeas petition from the substantive question of whether the petitioner is, in fact, in custody in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States and is entitled to the relief sought (typically, release from custody). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
Bush, President of the United States by the ABA Criminal Justice Section. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:44 pm
No Cuban court has jurisdiction to hear these petitioners' claims, and no law other than the laws of the United States applies at the naval station. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
United States). [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:29 pm
In addition to the practical concerns discussed above, the Eisentrager Court found relevant that each petitioner: “(a) is an enemy alien; (b) has never been or resided in the United States; (c) was captured outside of our territory and there held in military custody as a prisoner of war; (d) was tried and convicted by a Military Commission sitting outside the United States; (e) for offenses against laws of war committed outside the … [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:26 pm
Bush, a decision of the United States Supreme Court released today, the Court ruled in favour of Guantanamo detainees, finding they "have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice Thomas explained that the holding of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Bethlehem Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, a 4-page opinion, Judge Robb concludes: "We grant Petitioners' petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of clarifying the issues discussed above and affirm our original opinion in its entirety. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
United States, 127 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Since that time almost every major military ally of the United States has revised its policy to allow openly-gay service members, but the political will to change the policy in this country has been lacking. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
