Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 8:28 am
It argues that “U.S. federal court lacks jurisdiction over Megaupload” because it “is a wholly foreign corporation; it is not incorporated in the United States, and it has no agents or offices in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
For example, recent United States Supreme Court decisions have imposed significant limitations on the ability of public officials and public figures to win defamation actions. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:05 pm
In Craigslist Inc. v. 3Taps Inc., No. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:33 am
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
DIFFUSION AN INTERNATIONAL, INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE LAW Co-Sponsored by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law and Juris Diversitas 3 & 4 June 2013 Lausanne, Switzerland [For additional information, contact Marie Papeil at marie.papeil@isdc-dfjp.unil.ch ] Monday, June 3, 2013 8:30-9:30 Registration, Coffee … [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:40 am
Under the terms of the settlement, the have agreed to pay the United States and the State of California $14.1 million to settle claims that they violated the False Claims Act. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 9:31 am
On April 8, 2013, the court in Magic Laundry Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
'I don't think the decision of California will hold. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:41 pm
Landmark Missouri v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 11:00 am
This question is very much on our minds these days after the GPS case from last term — United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:53 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed with leave to amend (pdf) a suit alleging that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by failing to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service on the effects of 382 registered pesticides on endangered and threatened species. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:55 am
The magistrate judge granted defendant’s motion to compel, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California confirmed the ruling. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:42 am
The Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, making it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
United States, 12-884, involving state authority in the field of immigration, without comment beyond a one-line notation that “Justice Scalia dissents. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:44 am
In the next few weeks, the United States Supreme Court will decide a series of same-sex cases from Massachusetts and California. [read post]
