Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 12:09 am
Here's a description of the program: This program will discuss the 2010 United States Supreme Court decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:05 am
The University of Iowa College of Law invites submissions for a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
S., at 620 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Brief for Petitioners 31; Brief for United States 43; Brief for Respondent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (hereinafter PCAOB Brief); Tr. of Oral Arg. 47, and we decide the case with that understanding. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
See Media Copyright Group, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
The false marking statute includes a bounty hunter (i.e., qui tam) provision providing that “[a]ny person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
Anything that calls more attention to wanton GPS surveillance of citizens is well worth talking about because, mark my words, the Supreme Court is going to get this issue soon if United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Miller, editor ; with Louis Aucoin.Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Constitutional LawKF4930 .O75 2010The origins of the necessary and proper clause / Gary Lawson ... [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:54 pm
’ – some basic questions for Europe’s finest – Referral to ECJ in Case C-406/10 concerning software copyright (IPKat) France French ISP refuses to send out Hadopi file-sharing warnings (TorrentFreak) India Madras High Court hands Google ‘Adwords’ its first interim victory (Spicy IP) Norway New co.no extension available November (Class 46) Sweden The Pirate Bay appeal – Days 3, 4 and 5 (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ISPs… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:54 am
But, in this case, “there is no indication that Complainant has sought to challenge [the earlier] decision in a United States court or to otherwise enforce its trademark rights via Lanham Act litigation. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
If you are (i) seriously interested in regularly writing for a blog of good standing and high standards, (ii) thick-skinned enough to cope with criticism from readers and colleagues, (iii) very competent in terms of literacy, (iv) closely enough involved in patent dispute resolution to have something to say on a frequent basis and (v) based in a major patent litigating jurisdiction other than the United Kingdom, please email Jeremy here (subject line "PatLit")… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:41 pm
Credit: Westboro Baptist Church The first Monday in October marks the opening of the 2010 term for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:41 pm
Credit: Westboro Baptist Church The first Monday in October marks the opening of the 2010 term for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
The American Bar Association’s Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases includes copies of the briefs filed in scheduled and unscheduled OT2010 cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
United States; Haro v. [read post]
