Search for: "United States v. Peoples"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 22,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
The fine people who wrote the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (and their state equivalents) certainly had a sense of humor. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The case is about whether challenges to a federal regulation known as the “waters of the United States” rule must be filed in federal district courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:41 am
Or Hannay v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
As established in the Court of Justice of the European Union’s 2014 Google Spain case, this is a right under data protection law for individuals to request that search engines de-list specified results appearing in response to a search for the individual’s name.[1] While search engines may decline to de-list results based on public interest considerations, the RTBF is still far broader than de-listing or removal rights in many countries, including the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Dunsmuir is — by some distance — the most cited decision of any Canadian court and, for Canadians and Canadaphiles, synonymous with… The Lean Law FirmSmall Firms, Big Issues: Highlights of Thomson Reuters’ 2017 State of US Small Law Firms Survey More than half of all lawyers in the United States and Canada work in small firms of less than 30 people. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Two unanimous Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
In an eloquent speech to Congress given by Bingham on February 28, 1866, Bingham explained the need for and purpose of the 14th Amendment, and countered arguments against it: The question is, simply, whether you will give by this amendment to the people of the United States the power, by legislative enactment, to punish officials of States for violation of the oaths enjoined upon them by their Constitution? [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 7:42 pm
The Microsoft Ireland decision and the State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:10 am
After Reconstruction, the southern United States descended into the Jim Crow system marked by racialized violence, the deprivation of civil and political rights, and the exploitation of black labor. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:50 pm
The case is titled United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:43 pm
Dear friends, Today, the United States Congress struck a significant blow against the basic human right to read, write, learn, and associate free of government’s prying eyes. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:39 am
This also incentivized states to compete to innovate their corporate laws so they would attract people from outside the state to create a company in Delaware. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Consider, for instance, Darshan-Leitner’s most prominent (if temporary) legal victory: Sokolow v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:16 am
“[T]he government is now of the view that such ALJs are officers because they exercise ‘significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
