Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 8281 - 8300 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
An additional change, and one with significant impact on the detention question before me under §3142(f)(2), is the actual factual basis we now have both for the nature of the crimes with which Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm by Barry Barnett
Johnson Gas Appliance Co., 917 F. 2d 1574 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:06 am by scottgaille
 The owner of Dakota Access defended these tactics: “Due to the level of threats that were made against the company and its employees and the illegal activity that was taking place by the opposition, we felt this was necessary to protect our employees and the surrounding communities, which were our top priorities. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Loren DeJonge Schulman, Amy Schafer
These roles are profoundly difficult to learn and unlearn; to paraphrase John F. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
F/A-18 shot down a manned Syrian government Su-22 bomber that had attacked the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 6:44 am by José Guillermo
Siento vergüenza de artículos como el de la señora Francesca Denegri, una rica hipócrita intentando defender –sin éxito alguno posterior como siempre ha sido- a los desposeídos. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Laura Valade
The rule under ARS § 28-1381(A)(2) being that “[i]f the sample is drawn after the two-hour mark, an expert must use retroactive extrapolation to determine the blood alcohol content,” or BAC. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Laura Valade
The rule under ARS § 28-1381(A)(2) being that “[i]f the sample is drawn after the two-hour mark, an expert must use retroactive extrapolation to determine the blood alcohol content,” or BAC. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:01 am by Steven Boutwell
Gulf Oil Corp., 919 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1990): 1) [W]hat does the specific work order in effect at the time of injury provide? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that “the justices have looked the other way when oddly drawn districts clump voters based on party rather than race,” and that “[i]f the challenge to hyper-partisan line-drawing succeeds, the shape of districts to come may tighten the link between voters’ preferences and who gets elected. [read post]