Search for: "Little v State" Results 8281 - 8300 of 26,856
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
  This episode could easily be seen as just a little more of the same, and something that you either enjoy or regret depending on your feelings about the Administration and your degree of concern about what the Russia investigations might eventually uncover. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:23 am by ernst
As a consequence scholars knew very little about the Court’s internal deliberations in the landmark cases of its 1936 October Term.This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins… [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor did the fact that the decisionmakers questioned the veracity of his PTSD claim show that the stated reason for discharging him—creating a hostile and intimidating work environment for his subordinates—was pretextual, the Seventh Circuit ruled, affirming summary judgment against his ADA and Rehab Act claims (Monroe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
That implies that Citigroup currently has paid only a 7 percent tax rate on its offshore profits to foreign governments, indicating that most of the money is booked in tax havens levying little to no tax. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
There is little evidence at this stage that an Illinois law is being used to regulate conduct occurring wholly outside the state. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion when it denied the part of the motion which requested attorney fees (Difone v Difone 87 D3d 971, Taormina v Taormina 131 AD3 696). [read post]