Search for: "New v. New" Results 8281 - 8300 of 166,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 11:03 am
Here are the first pleadings on behalf of the defense in Rakofsky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
Going forward, Thomas explained, courts should uphold gun restrictions only if there is a tradition of such regulation in U.S. history The state law at the heart of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Vomero v City of New York, et al has unanimously held that the City of New York Board of Standards and Appeals abused its discretion in granting a use variance to use residentially-zoned property for commercial use. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Vomero v City of New York, et al has unanimously held that the City of New York Board of Standards and Appeals abused its discretion in granting a use variance to use residentially-zoned property for commercial use. [read post]
9 May 2008, 8:56 am
Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 12:02 am
But that still doesn't mean that associates in New York are better off. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:33 am
Here, in an early report from the Competition Law 360 Blog is a report that:"Kaye Scholer LLP is facing a legal malpractice suit over the way attorneys handled several antitrust suits accusing Celanese Americas Corp. of fixing the price of polyester staple fiber. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 6:21 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The new judge should moreover determine whether the public interest defence is available to the defendants without reference to the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on section 4. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
  After all, although they emphasized intervention during oral argument, even the City of New York and the Solicitor General argued that, because of the unique nature of the FCA, the sixty-day limit should apply when the government does not formally intervene but asserts "particular rights" or "actively participates" in the action. [read post]