Search for: "State of New York v. United States"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 16,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 12:24 am
In August 2016, the case was transferred from Connecticut to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, case no. 1:16-cv-06378. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:44 pm
Mental Hygiene Law §81.07(g)(1)(v). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am
The specific question before the court was whether it is consistent with the obligations of the United States under the New York Convention for federal courts to apply traditional doctrines of equitable estoppel that permit the enforcement of an arbitration agreement by a business that did not sign the agreement. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm
This holds true not only for New York employers, but also all employers located within the United States, as emphasized by the Court’s reliance on several U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm
This holds true not only for New York employers, but also all employers located within the United States, as emphasized by the Court’s reliance on several U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
Applying the principles of New York law, we do not discern reversible error in the district court's dismissal of the action against Mr. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
McDONOUGH and DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP, Defendants.10 Civ. 6106 (DAB)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Jesner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:40 am
It appears in the New York Times Sunday Book Review of June 13. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
The First Amendment issues in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:51 pm
The District Court has now issued its order and granted Amarin the injunction it requested, in what surely will be considered a landmark ruling regarding the First Amendment and truthful, non-misleading off-label promotion, alongside the Second Circuit’s United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Scott Anderson, Suzanne Maloney, Natan Sachs and Hady Amr spoke about the meaning of the deal for the domestic political environments of Israel, Iran and the United States, its potential impact on the Palestinians and how the agreement could change regional dynamics more broadly: Daniel Byman discussed how a new administration could more effectively combat rising white supremacist violence in the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
And immigration law could soon be heading for a new chapter. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 6:45 am
In Janus v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978).The Supreme Court of the United States in Penn established that the following factors must be evaluated to determine if property is taken without physical means: 1) the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant; 2) the extent to which the regulation interfered with distinct, investment-backed expectations and 3) the character of the government action. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
ATIC's address at the time was 275 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
That dispute ultimately reached the Supreme Court, in the case of New York Times Co. et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:16 am
Texas v. [read post]
