Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8281 - 8300 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 2:18 am by Kelly
Trademark dispute between Easydate and EasyGroup (Class 46) United States US General Availability of client data on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google sinks trade secrets claim: Sasqua Group v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm by Gene Quinn
On September 3, 2010, IHOP IP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the owner of various IHOP registered trademarks in the United States, sued the International House of Prayer alleging various trademark infringement theories. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm by Don Cruse
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:29 am by Lawrence Solum
CALL FOR PAPERS:  For a proposed symposium  to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:20 am by Dan Filler
This from the folks at the University of Iowa: CALL FOR PAPERS:  For a proposed symposium  to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Detainees’ rights – the next round starts – SCOTUSblog: The United States Supreme Court Blog discuses the case of Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al-Odah — a Kuwaiti national who has been a captive at Guantanamo Bay for nearly nine years – which is winding its way through the US justice system. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm by Gene Quinn
Then a draft of a amicus brief Lemly filed today with the United States Supreme Court arrived in my inbox and I knew this was the issue that would make for an excellent interview. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:59 am by Kali Borkoski
  Among other things, sixty-nine percent indicated that the Court “is a crucial governing body for the success of the United States. [read post]